<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cache Miss Rate as a function of Cache Size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tokutek.com/2009/09/cache_miss_rate_as_a_function_of_cache_size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tokutek.com/2009/09/cache_miss_rate_as_a_function_of_cache_size/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 04:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Callaghan</title>
		<link>http://www.tokutek.com/2009/09/cache_miss_rate_as_a_function_of_cache_size/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Callaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cache_miss_rate_as_a_function_of_cache_size#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I updated the graph to include the Zipfian distribution for the CDF -- H(C/1000, s=1.55) / H(D/1000, s=1.55). C and D are divided by 1000 to make the sum computation faster. That function matches the measured miss rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I updated the graph to include the Zipfian distribution for the CDF &#8212; H(C/1000, s=1.55) / H(D/1000, s=1.55). C and D are divided by 1000 to make the sum computation faster. That function matches the measured miss rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

